linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/8] efi: Decode IA32/X64 Processor Error Info Structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180226193904.20532-4-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:38:59 -0600
From:   Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
To:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
        bp@...e.de, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] efi: Decode IA32/X64 Processor Error Info Structure

From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>

Print the fields in the IA32/X64 Processor Error Info Structure.

Based on UEFI 2.7 Table 256. IA32/X64 Processor Error Information
Structure.

Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
---
Link:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180223200333.6410-4-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com

v1->v2:
* Add parantheses around "bits" expression in macro.
* Fix indentation on multi-line statements.

 drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c
index 9da0d981178f..417bd4e500a7 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c
@@ -3,15 +3,28 @@
 
 #include <linux/cper.h>
 
+#define INDENT_SP	" "
+
 /*
  * We don't need a "CPER_IA" prefix since these are all locally defined.
  * This will save us a lot of line space.
  */
 #define VALID_LAPIC_ID			BIT_ULL(0)
 #define VALID_CPUID_INFO		BIT_ULL(1)
+#define VALID_PROC_ERR_INFO_NUM(bits)	(((bits) & GENMASK_ULL(7, 2)) >> 2)
+
+#define INFO_VALID_CHECK_INFO		BIT_ULL(0)
+#define INFO_VALID_TARGET_ID		BIT_ULL(1)
+#define INFO_VALID_REQUESTOR_ID		BIT_ULL(2)
+#define INFO_VALID_RESPONDER_ID		BIT_ULL(3)
+#define INFO_VALID_IP			BIT_ULL(4)
 
 void cper_print_proc_ia(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_proc_ia *proc)
 {
+	int i;
+	struct cper_ia_err_info *err_info;
+	char newpfx[64];
+
 	printk("%sValidation Bits: 0x%016llx\n", pfx, proc->validation_bits);
 
 	if (proc->validation_bits & VALID_LAPIC_ID)
@@ -22,4 +35,44 @@ void cper_print_proc_ia(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_proc_ia *proc)
 		print_hex_dump(pfx, "", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 4, proc->cpuid,
 			       sizeof(proc->cpuid), 0);
 	}
+
+	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
+
+	err_info = (struct cper_ia_err_info *)(proc + 1);
+	for (i = 0; i < VALID_PROC_ERR_INFO_NUM(proc->validation_bits); i++) {
+		printk("%sError Information Structure %d:\n", pfx, i);
+
+		printk("%sError Structure Type: %pUl\n", newpfx,
+		       &err_info->err_type);
+
+		printk("%sValidation Bits: 0x%016llx\n",
+		       newpfx, err_info->validation_bits);
+
+		if (err_info->validation_bits & INFO_VALID_CHECK_INFO) {
+			printk("%sCheck Information: 0x%016llx\n", newpfx,
+			       err_info->check_info);
+		}
+
+		if (err_info->validation_bits & INFO_VALID_TARGET_ID) {
+			printk("%sTarget Identifier: 0x%016llx\n",
+			       newpfx, err_info->target_id);
+		}
+
+		if (err_info->validation_bits & INFO_VALID_REQUESTOR_ID) {
+			printk("%sRequestor Identifier: 0x%016llx\n",
+			       newpfx, err_info->requestor_id);
+		}
+
+		if (err_info->validation_bits & INFO_VALID_RESPONDER_ID) {
+			printk("%sResponder Identifier: 0x%016llx\n",
+			       newpfx, err_info->responder_id);
+		}
+
+		if (err_info->validation_bits & INFO_VALID_IP) {
+			printk("%sInstruction Pointer: 0x%016llx\n",
+			       newpfx, err_info->ip);
+		}
+
+		err_info++;
+	}
 }
-- 
2.14.1