lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:02:45 +0800
From:   Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To:     Evgeniy Didin <Evgeniy.Didin@...opsys.com>
Cc:     <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
        Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        "Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix DTO/STO timeout overflow
 calculation

On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:34:11 +0300 Evgeniy Didin  wrote:

> For some 32-bit architectures calculation of DTO and STO timeout can be incorrect
> due to multiply overflow. Lets prevent this by casting multiply and result to u64.
> 
> Suggested by Jisheng Zhang.
> Switch DIV_ROUND_UP macro to DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL is not reasonable
> because overflow happens on multiply and DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL helps
> with sum overflow.

hmmm, I mean something as below:

-cto_ms = DIV_ROUND_UP(MSEC_PER_SEC * cto_clks * cto_div, host->bus_hz);
+cto_ms = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)MSEC_PER_SEC * cto_clks * cto_div, host->bus_hz);

This could avoid build error in arm case.

> 
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> -add fix for cto_ms
> 
> Evgeniy Didin (2):
>   mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the DTO timeout overflow calculation for 32-bit
>     systems
>   mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the CTO overflow calculation for 32-bit systems

These two patches could be folded into one patch?

Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ