linux-kernel - Re: Linux 4.16: Reported regressions as of Monday, 2018-02-26 (Was: Linux 4.16-rc3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:21:48 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        William Grant <william.grant@...onical.com>,
        Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.16: Reported regressions as of Monday, 2018-02-26 (Was: Linux 4.16-rc3)

On Monday, February 26, 2018 11:25:09 AM CET Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 26.02.2018 04:05, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > We're on the normal schedule for 4.16 and everything still looks very regular.
> 
> Hi! Find below my second regression report for Linux 4.16. It lists 8
> regressions I'm currently aware of.
> 
> To anyone reading this: Are you aware of any other regressions that got
> introduced this development cycle? Then please let me know by mail (a
> simple bounce or forward to the email address is enough!).
> 
> For details see http://bit.ly/lnxregtrackid And please tell me if there
> is anything in the report that shouldn't be there.

Please add https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198763

It has a bisect result and seems to be readily reproducible.

No response from the author of the problematic commit so far.

Thanks,
Rafael