[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180227130859.GC32493@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:08:59 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/54] 4.14.23-stable review
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:59:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 02/26/2018 12:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.23 release.
> > There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 28 20:21:22 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> microblaze, m32r:
>
> include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:8:2: warning: #warning inconsistent configuration, needs CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN [-Wcpp]
> #warning inconsistent configuration, needs CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> ^~~~~~~
> /opt/buildbot/slave/stable-queue-4.14/build/lib/find_bit.c:176:15: error: redefinition of ‘find_next_zero_bit_le’
>
> v4.15 is also affected (m32r builds in v4.15, though, for some reason).
This sounds like Arnd's Kbuild change 101110f6271c ("Kbuild: always
define endianess in kconfig.h")
Does this problem also show up in Linus's tree?
Arnd, any ideas?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists