| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFLvi2357U3HAt3mXDdNdZs4QA9mqWntTny4XyvtSfV2hu1dmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:53:44 -0800
From: Quytelda Kahja <quytelda@...alin.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
hans.verkuil@...co.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: bcm2048: Fix function argument alignment in radio-bcm2048.c.
Hans,
Thank you very much for your input on the patch; however this patch
has already been applied to the staging tree. Additionally:
> What coding style problem? You should give a short description of
> what you are fixing.
The subject of the patch (which becomes the subject of the email when
using `git format-patch`) describes the change more fully: "Staging:
bcm2048: Fix function argument alignment in radio-bcm2048.c". It's a
really trivial patch, so there's not too much to say. That extra
comment is just redundant, I suppose.
> Just drop this change: it will replace one warning (non-aligned) with
> another (> 80 cols).
Breaking the 80 character line limit is arguably excusable for this
code because of the 36 character function name and 30 character
constant name; additionally, it has been said that the 80 character
line limit will probably be increased in the future since we run
modern machines that aren't limited to 80 character terminals anymore,
so this warning may soon be irrelevant anyway.
Thank you,
Quytelda Kahja
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:51 AM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
> On 02/20/2018 07:53 AM, Quytelda Kahja wrote:
>> Fix a coding style problem.
>
> What coding style problem? You should give a short description of
> what you are fixing.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Quytelda Kahja <quytelda@...alin.org>
>> ---
>> This is the patch without the unnecessary fixes for line length.
>>
>> drivers/staging/media/bcm2048/radio-bcm2048.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/bcm2048/radio-bcm2048.c b/drivers/staging/media/bcm2048/radio-bcm2048.c
>> index 06d1920150da..f38a4f2acdde 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/bcm2048/radio-bcm2048.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/bcm2048/radio-bcm2048.c
>> @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ static int bcm2048_probe(struct bcm2048_device *bdev)
>> goto unlock;
>>
>> err = bcm2048_set_fm_search_rssi_threshold(bdev,
>> - BCM2048_DEFAULT_RSSI_THRESHOLD);
>> + BCM2048_DEFAULT_RSSI_THRESHOLD);
>> if (err < 0)
>> goto unlock;
>>
>
> Just drop this change: it will replace one warning (non-aligned) with
> another (> 80 cols).
>
> This code is fine as it is.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>> @@ -1942,9 +1942,9 @@ static irqreturn_t bcm2048_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>> */
>> #define property_write(prop, type, mask, check) \
>> static ssize_t bcm2048_##prop##_write(struct device *dev, \
>> - struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> - const char *buf, \
>> - size_t count) \
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> + const char *buf, \
>> + size_t count) \
>> { \
>> struct bcm2048_device *bdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
>> type value; \
>> @@ -1966,8 +1966,8 @@ static ssize_t bcm2048_##prop##_write(struct device *dev, \
>>
>> #define property_read(prop, mask) \
>> static ssize_t bcm2048_##prop##_read(struct device *dev, \
>> - struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> - char *buf) \
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> + char *buf) \
>> { \
>> struct bcm2048_device *bdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
>> int value; \
>> @@ -1985,8 +1985,8 @@ static ssize_t bcm2048_##prop##_read(struct device *dev, \
>>
>> #define property_signed_read(prop, size, mask) \
>> static ssize_t bcm2048_##prop##_read(struct device *dev, \
>> - struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> - char *buf) \
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> + char *buf) \
>> { \
>> struct bcm2048_device *bdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
>> size value; \
>> @@ -2005,8 +2005,8 @@ property_read(prop, mask) \
>>
>> #define property_str_read(prop, size) \
>> static ssize_t bcm2048_##prop##_read(struct device *dev, \
>> - struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> - char *buf) \
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, \
>> + char *buf) \
>> { \
>> struct bcm2048_device *bdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
>> int count; \
>> @@ -2175,7 +2175,7 @@ static int bcm2048_fops_release(struct file *file)
>> }
>>
>> static __poll_t bcm2048_fops_poll(struct file *file,
>> - struct poll_table_struct *pts)
>> + struct poll_table_struct *pts)
>> {
>> struct bcm2048_device *bdev = video_drvdata(file);
>> __poll_t retval = 0;
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists