[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180227200830.GA3164@andrea>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:08:31 +0100
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/xchg/alpha: Remove memory barriers from the
_local() variants
[+ Will]
I'm not sure how this happened; Will, you at least figure as Reported-by: ;-)
Andrea
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 05:00:58AM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> Commits 79d442461df74 ("locking/xchg/alpha: Clean up barrier usage by using
> smp_mb() in place of __ASM__MB") and 472e8c55cf662 ("locking/xchg/alpha:
> Fix xchg() and cmpxchg() memory ordering bugs") ended up adding unnecessary
> barriers to the _local variants, which the previous code took care to avoid.
>
> Fix them by adding the smp_mb() into the cmpxchg macro rather than into the
> ____cmpxchg variants.
>
> Fixes: 79d442461df74 ("locking/xchg/alpha: Clean up barrier usage by using smp_mb() in place of __ASM__MB")
> Fixes: 472e8c55cf662 ("locking/xchg/alpha: Fix xchg() and cmpxchg() memory ordering bugs")
> Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h | 27 ---------------------------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> index 8a2b331e43feb..6c7c394524714 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> @@ -38,19 +38,31 @@
> #define ____cmpxchg(type, args...) __cmpxchg ##type(args)
> #include <asm/xchg.h>
>
> +/*
> + * The leading and the trailing memory barriers guarantee that these
> + * operations are fully ordered.
> + */
> #define xchg(ptr, x) \
> ({ \
> + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
> __typeof__(*(ptr)) _x_ = (x); \
> - (__typeof__(*(ptr))) __xchg((ptr), (unsigned long)_x_, \
> - sizeof(*(ptr))); \
> + smp_mb(); \
> + __ret = (__typeof__(*(ptr))) \
> + __xchg((ptr), (unsigned long)_x_, sizeof(*(ptr))); \
> + smp_mb(); \
> + __ret; \
> })
>
> #define cmpxchg(ptr, o, n) \
> ({ \
> + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
> __typeof__(*(ptr)) _o_ = (o); \
> __typeof__(*(ptr)) _n_ = (n); \
> - (__typeof__(*(ptr))) __cmpxchg((ptr), (unsigned long)_o_, \
> - (unsigned long)_n_, sizeof(*(ptr)));\
> + smp_mb(); \
> + __ret = (__typeof__(*(ptr))) __cmpxchg((ptr), \
> + (unsigned long)_o_, (unsigned long)_n_, sizeof(*(ptr)));\
> + smp_mb(); \
> + __ret; \
> })
>
> #define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
> index e2b59fac5257d..7adb80c6746ac 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
> @@ -12,10 +12,6 @@
> * Atomic exchange.
> * Since it can be used to implement critical sections
> * it must clobber "memory" (also for interrupts in UP).
> - *
> - * The leading and the trailing memory barriers guarantee that these
> - * operations are fully ordered.
> - *
> */
>
> static inline unsigned long
> @@ -23,7 +19,6 @@ ____xchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned long val)
> {
> unsigned long ret, tmp, addr64;
>
> - smp_mb();
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> " andnot %4,7,%3\n"
> " insbl %1,%4,%1\n"
> @@ -38,7 +33,6 @@ ____xchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned long val)
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (val), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (addr64)
> : "r" ((long)m), "1" (val) : "memory");
> - smp_mb();
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -48,7 +42,6 @@ ____xchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned long val)
> {
> unsigned long ret, tmp, addr64;
>
> - smp_mb();
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> " andnot %4,7,%3\n"
> " inswl %1,%4,%1\n"
> @@ -63,7 +56,6 @@ ____xchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned long val)
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (val), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (addr64)
> : "r" ((long)m), "1" (val) : "memory");
> - smp_mb();
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -73,7 +65,6 @@ ____xchg(_u32, volatile int *m, unsigned long val)
> {
> unsigned long dummy;
>
> - smp_mb();
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> "1: ldl_l %0,%4\n"
> " bis $31,%3,%1\n"
> @@ -84,7 +75,6 @@ ____xchg(_u32, volatile int *m, unsigned long val)
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (val), "=&r" (dummy), "=m" (*m)
> : "rI" (val), "m" (*m) : "memory");
> - smp_mb();
>
> return val;
> }
> @@ -94,7 +84,6 @@ ____xchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long val)
> {
> unsigned long dummy;
>
> - smp_mb();
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> "1: ldq_l %0,%4\n"
> " bis $31,%3,%1\n"
> @@ -105,7 +94,6 @@ ____xchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long val)
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (val), "=&r" (dummy), "=m" (*m)
> : "rI" (val), "m" (*m) : "memory");
> - smp_mb();
>
> return val;
> }
> @@ -135,13 +123,6 @@ ____xchg(, volatile void *ptr, unsigned long x, int size)
> * Atomic compare and exchange. Compare OLD with MEM, if identical,
> * store NEW in MEM. Return the initial value in MEM. Success is
> * indicated by comparing RETURN with OLD.
> - *
> - * The leading and the trailing memory barriers guarantee that these
> - * operations are fully ordered.
> - *
> - * The trailing memory barrier is placed in SMP unconditionally, in
> - * order to guarantee that dependency ordering is preserved when a
> - * dependency is headed by an unsuccessful operation.
> */
>
> static inline unsigned long
> @@ -149,7 +130,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned char old, unsigned char new)
> {
> unsigned long prev, tmp, cmp, addr64;
>
> - smp_mb();
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> " andnot %5,7,%4\n"
> " insbl %1,%5,%1\n"
> @@ -167,7 +147,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned char old, unsigned char new)
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (prev), "=&r" (new), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (cmp), "=&r" (addr64)
> : "r" ((long)m), "Ir" (old), "1" (new) : "memory");
> - smp_mb();
>
> return prev;
> }
> @@ -177,7 +156,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned short old, unsigned short new)
> {
> unsigned long prev, tmp, cmp, addr64;
>
> - smp_mb();
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> " andnot %5,7,%4\n"
> " inswl %1,%5,%1\n"
> @@ -195,7 +173,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned short old, unsigned short new)
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (prev), "=&r" (new), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (cmp), "=&r" (addr64)
> : "r" ((long)m), "Ir" (old), "1" (new) : "memory");
> - smp_mb();
>
> return prev;
> }
> @@ -205,7 +182,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u32, volatile int *m, int old, int new)
> {
> unsigned long prev, cmp;
>
> - smp_mb();
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> "1: ldl_l %0,%5\n"
> " cmpeq %0,%3,%1\n"
> @@ -219,7 +195,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u32, volatile int *m, int old, int new)
> ".previous"
> : "=&r"(prev), "=&r"(cmp), "=m"(*m)
> : "r"((long) old), "r"(new), "m"(*m) : "memory");
> - smp_mb();
>
> return prev;
> }
> @@ -229,7 +204,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
> {
> unsigned long prev, cmp;
>
> - smp_mb();
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> "1: ldq_l %0,%5\n"
> " cmpeq %0,%3,%1\n"
> @@ -243,7 +217,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
> ".previous"
> : "=&r"(prev), "=&r"(cmp), "=m"(*m)
> : "r"((long) old), "r"(new), "m"(*m) : "memory");
> - smp_mb();
>
> return prev;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists