[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83d1a6d8-0816-9f75-34f6-4b93e84393e4@micronovasrl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 19:22:14 +0100
From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: init dclk_min_div & dclk_max_div inside
encoder init functions
Hi,
Il 28/02/2018 17:34, Giulio Benetti ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Il 28/02/2018 16:55, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:51:58PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>>> sun4i_dclk_round_rate is called before sun4i_tcon_mode_set,
>>> so it finds dclk_min_div and dclk_max_div set to 0 and fails
>>> adding crtc.
>>>
>>> Move dclk_min_div and dclk_max_div to encoders init functions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
>>
>> I sent a similar patch there:
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-February/166666.html
>>
>
> I've missed that.
> And where you put it is better, since it's called every time set_mode is
> called.
>
> On lvds instead I don't see anything about this,
> it should have the same potential problem.
> Also I can't understand why it has been set min=7 and max=7 on lvds.
> With those values I would obtain 77Mhz only.
> And I can't find values on datasheet for minimum and maximum.
Submitted patchset for that.
>
>>
>> I guess eventually, we'll want to remove the usage of the clock
>> framework entirely, but it's not really the scope of a fix.
>
> Where would you handle dclk instead of tcon?
Don't mind.
--
Giulio Benetti
CTO
MICRONOVA SRL
Sede: Via A. Niedda 3 - 35010 Vigonza (PD)
Tel. 049/8931563 - Fax 049/8931346
Cod.Fiscale - P.IVA 02663420285
Capitale Sociale € 26.000 i.v.
Iscritta al Reg. Imprese di Padova N. 02663420285
Numero R.E.A. 258642
>
> Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists