lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:09:37 -0500
From:   Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:     Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@...cle.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, jgross@...e.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
        roger.pau@...rix.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, hch@...radead.org,
        JBeulich@...e.com, x86@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        rkrcmar@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...e.de, davem@...emloft.net,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 3/7] xen/pvh: Create a new file for
 Xen specific PVH code

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:27:59AM -0800, Maran Wilson wrote:
> We need to refactor PVH entry code so that support for other hypervisors
> like Qemu/KVM can be added more easily.
> 
> The first step in that direction is to create a new file that will
> eventually hold the Xen specific routines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@...cle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/pvh.c               |  1 -
>  arch/x86/xen/Makefile        |  1 +
>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pvh.c b/arch/x86/pvh.c
> index 436c4f003e17..b56cb5e7d6ac 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pvh.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pvh.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>   * xen_pvh and pvh_bootparams need to live in data segment since they

Perhaps remove 'xen_pvh' from there..
>   * are used after startup_{32|64}, which clear .bss, are invoked.
>   */
> -bool xen_pvh __attribute__((section(".data"))) = 0;
>  struct boot_params pvh_bootparams __attribute__((section(".data")));
>  
>  struct hvm_start_info pvh_start_info;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> index 7e8145b33997..ef6481a83768 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ obj-y		:= enlighten.o multicalls.o mmu.o irq.o \
>  obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM)		+= enlighten_hvm.o mmu_hvm.o suspend_hvm.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PV)			+= setup.o apic.o pmu.o suspend_pv.o \
>  						p2m.o enlighten_pv.o mmu_pv.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PVH)			+= enlighten_pvh.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING) += trace.o
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4b4e9cc78b8a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * PVH variables.
> + *
> + * The variables xen_pvh and pvh_bootparams need to live in the data segment

And remove 'and pvh_bootparams' here as well?

> + * since they are used after startup_{32|64} is invoked, which will clear the
> + * .bss segment.
> + */
> +bool xen_pvh __attribute__((section(".data"))) = 0;
> +
> -- 
> 2.16.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ