[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1519814668.10722.268.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:44:28 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: "Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] lib/vsprintf: Remove useless NULL checks
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 11:04 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2018-02-27 19:35:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 16:50 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2018-02-16 23:07:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > This macro matches also values <= 16.
> >
> > Yes, I know.
> >
> > This had been discussed with Rasmus and we agreed that printing a
> > result
> > of kmalloc(0) is rather weird.
>
> I see
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1500546142.29303.133.camel@linux.intel.com
> There you suggested to move this check into pointer(). But I do not
> see any agreement on this.
>
Btw, I'm pretty sure that the checks like this or another one with
PAGE_SIZE is cargo cult programming rather than imaging possible so
weird use cases.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists