[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVVDiuv7bpdC0X95Xy9dSK_TfjW5RvSekVym9Q02798Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:11:13 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: rockchip: power-domain: remove PM clocks
Hi Tomasz,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org> wrote:
>>> Also, how about systems where runtime PM is disabled? I think that's
>>> one of the reasons we control the clocks explicitly in the drivers
>>> anyway.
>>
>> On many platforms, Runtime PM is always enabled.
>
> Can we make such assumption? If so, could we just make an explicit
> "select PM_RUNTIME" in Kconfig of the SoC?
Note that the PM_RUNTIME symbol was removed in commit 464ed18ebdb6236f
("PM: Eliminate CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME"), in favor of plain PM.
The following already select PM unconditionally:
- ARCH_OMAP2PLUS_TYPICAL
- ARCH_RENESAS (except EMEV2)
- ARCH_TEGRA
- ARCH_VEXPRESS
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists