[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1519831221.741018268@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:20:21 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Nikolay Aleksandrov" <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 053/140] net: bridge: fix early call to
br_stp_change_bridge_id and plug newlink leaks
3.2.100-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
commit 84aeb437ab98a2bce3d4b2111c79723aedfceb33 upstream.
The early call to br_stp_change_bridge_id in bridge's newlink can cause
a memory leak if an error occurs during the newlink because the fdb
entries are not cleaned up if a different lladdr was specified, also
another minor issue is that it generates fdb notifications with
ifindex = 0. Another unrelated memory leak is the bridge sysfs entries
which get added on NETDEV_REGISTER event, but are not cleaned up in the
newlink error path. To remove this special case the call to
br_stp_change_bridge_id is done after netdev register and we cleanup the
bridge on changelink error via br_dev_delete to plug all leaks.
This patch makes netlink bridge destruction on newlink error the same as
dellink and ioctl del which is necessary since at that point we have a
fully initialized bridge device.
To reproduce the issue:
$ ip l add br0 address 00:11:22:33:44:55 type bridge group_fwd_mask 1
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
$ rmmod bridge
[ 1822.142525] =============================================================================
[ 1822.143640] BUG bridge_fdb_cache (Tainted: G O ): Objects remaining in bridge_fdb_cache on __kmem_cache_shutdown()
[ 1822.144821] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 1822.145990] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[ 1822.146732] INFO: Slab 0x0000000092a844b2 objects=32 used=2 fp=0x00000000fef011b0 flags=0x1ffff8000000100
[ 1822.147700] CPU: 2 PID: 13584 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G B O 4.15.0-rc2+ #87
[ 1822.148578] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140531_083030-gandalf 04/01/2014
[ 1822.150008] Call Trace:
[ 1822.150510] dump_stack+0x78/0xa9
[ 1822.151156] slab_err+0xb1/0xd3
[ 1822.151834] ? __kmalloc+0x1bb/0x1ce
[ 1822.152546] __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x151/0x28b
[ 1822.153395] shutdown_cache+0x13/0x144
[ 1822.154126] kmem_cache_destroy+0x1c0/0x1fb
[ 1822.154669] SyS_delete_module+0x194/0x244
[ 1822.155199] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[ 1822.155773] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0x9a
[ 1822.156343] RIP: 0033:0x7f929bd38b17
[ 1822.156859] RSP: 002b:00007ffd160e9a98 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
[ 1822.157728] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005578316ba090 RCX: 00007f929bd38b17
[ 1822.158422] RDX: 00007f929bd9ec60 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005578316ba0f0
[ 1822.159114] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 00007f929bff5f20 R09: 00007ffd160e8a11
[ 1822.159808] R10: 00007ffd160e9860 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffd160e8a80
[ 1822.160513] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00005578316ba090
[ 1822.161278] INFO: Object 0x000000007645de29 @offset=0
[ 1822.161666] INFO: Object 0x00000000d5df2ab5 @offset=128
Fixes: 30313a3d5794 ("bridge: Handle IFLA_ADDRESS correctly when creating bridge device")
Fixes: 5b8d5429daa0 ("bridge: netlink: register netdevice before executing changelink")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: register_netdevice() was the last thing done in
br_dev_newlink(), so no extra cleanup is needed]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
@@ -215,6 +215,11 @@ static int br_dev_newlink(struct net *sr
struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
{
struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
+ int err;
+
+ err = register_netdevice(dev);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) {
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
@@ -222,7 +227,7 @@ static int br_dev_newlink(struct net *sr
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
}
- return register_netdevice(dev);
+ return 0;
}
struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops __read_mostly = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists