linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] dtc updates for 4.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNARdHBVBw_7ftyTEtyJ5KSX03dqB7y+=o2xQH1rYPtChTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 13:43:59 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] dtc updates for 4.17

2018-03-01 8:32 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>:
> This series updates building dtc with flex and bison rather than using
> the _shipped files and updates dtc to the current upstream version. The
> new dtc adds some new warnings, so turn off the noisiest ones. While
> here adjusting the warnings, we can also now re-enable some that have
> gotten fixed.
>
> Yamada-san, I figured out why you wanted the dtc update after I wrote
> the patch to remove the shipped files... :) I guess you may already have
> a similar patch.


Exactly, this is what I expected.

What I blocked me was ambiguous grammar
as I mentioned in:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2670836.html



> I suppose the first patch should go into 4.16, but
> nothing needs the fix yet. So it may be easier if you can just ack it
> and I'll keep it with the rest of the series.

Just browsing the series, nothing of the rest of it depends on 1/6
but feel free to pick it to your tree if you want.





-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada