linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] sysctl: Add flags to support min/max range clamping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af969ff8-96f7-3414-b451-df5e2471d0d4@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:54:17 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] sysctl: Add flags to support min/max range
 clamping

On 03/01/2018 04:31 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu,  1 Mar 2018 12:43:37 -0500 Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> When minimum/maximum values are specified for a sysctl parameter in
>> the ctl_table structure with proc_dointvec_minmax() handler, update
>> to that parameter will fail with error if the given value is outside
>> of the required range.
>>
>> There are use cases where it may be better to clamp the value of
>> the sysctl parameter to the given range without failing the update,
>> especially if the users are not aware of the actual range limits.
>> Reading the value back after the update will now be a good practice
>> to see if the provided value exceeds the range limits.
>>
>> To provide this less restrictive form of range checking, a new flags
>> field is added to the ctl_table structure. The new field is a 16-bit
>> value that just fits into the hole left by the 16-bit umode_t field
>> without increasing the size of the structure.
>>
>> When the CTL_FLAGS_CLAMP_RANGE flag is set in the ctl_table entry,
>> any update from the userspace will be clamped to the given range
>> without error.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/include/linux/sysctl.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sysctl.h
>> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct ctl_table
>>  	void *data;
>>  	int maxlen;
>>  	umode_t mode;
>> +	uint16_t flags;
> It would be nice to make this have type `enum ctl_table_flags', but I
> guess there's then no reliable way of forcing it to be 16-bit.
> I guess this is the best we can do...
>
> --- a/include/linux/sysctl.h~sysctl-add-flags-to-support-min-max-range-clamping-fix
> +++ a/include/linux/sysctl.h
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct ctl_table
>  	void *data;
>  	int maxlen;
>  	umode_t mode;
> -	uint16_t flags;
> +	uint16_t flags;			/* enum ctl_table_flags */
>  	struct ctl_table *child;	/* Deprecated */
>  	proc_handler *proc_handler;	/* Callback for text formatting */
>  	struct ctl_table_poll *poll;
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct ctl_table
>  } __randomize_layout;
>  
>  /**
> - * enum ctl_table_flags - flags for the ctl table
> + * enum ctl_table_flags - flags for the ctl table (struct ctl_table.flags)
>   *
>   * @CTL_FLAGS_CLAMP_RANGE: Set to indicate that the entry should be
>   *	flexibly clamped to min/max range in case the user provided

The flags field is actually a bit mask of various bits defined in the
enum type. So I will not change the type of flags to enum
ctl_table_flags as it is not strictly an enum type. However, I can
certainly add the suggested comment change in the next version of the patch.

Cheers,
Longman