[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180301231536.GB74737@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 17:15:36 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] PCI/P2PDMA: Clear ACS P2P flags for all devices
behind switches
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:54:01PM +0000, Stephen Bates wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed review Bjorn!
>
> >> + Enabling this option will also disable ACS on all ports behind
> >> + any PCIe switch. This effictively puts all devices behind any
> >> + switch into the same IOMMU group.
>
> > Does this really mean "all devices behind the same Root Port"?
>
> Not necessarily. You might have a cascade of switches (i.e switches
> below a switch) to achieve a very large fan-out (in an NVMe SSD
> array for example) and we will only disable ACS on the ports below
> the relevant switch.
The question is what the relevant switch is. We call pci_enable_acs()
on every PCI device, including Root Ports. It looks like this relies
on get_upstream_bridge_port() to filter out some things. I don't
think get_upstream_bridge_port() is doing the right thing, so we need
to sort that out first, I guess.
> > What does this mean in terms of device security? I assume it means,
> > at least, that individual devices can't be assigned to separate VMs.
>
> This was discussed during v1 [1]. Disabling ACS on all downstream
> ports of the switch means that all the EPs below it have to part of
> the same IOMMU grouping. However it was also agreed that as long as
> the ACS disable occurred at boot time (which is does in v2) then the
> virtualization layer will be aware of it and will perform the IOMMU
> group formation correctly.
>
> > I don't mind admitting that this patch makes me pretty nervous, and I
> > don't have a clear idea of what the implications of this are, or how
> > to communicate those to end users. "The same IOMMU group" is a pretty
> > abstract idea.
>
> Alex gave a good overview of the implications in [1].
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=151512320031739&w=2
This might be a good start, but whatever the implications are, they
need to be distilled and made clear directly in the changelog and the
Kconfig help text.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists