[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20f82d4c-9591-7770-aeca-0331a7940f5d@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 07:11:19 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@...cle.com>
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, roger.pau@...rix.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, hch@...radead.org, JBeulich@...e.com,
x86@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.lendacky@....com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...e.de, davem@...emloft.net,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 2/7] xen/pvh: Move PVH entry code out
of Xen specific tree
On 28/02/18 22:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 28/02/2018 22:08, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PVH) += pvh.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PVH) += pvh-head.o
>> +
>
> Probably a better place for these would be
> arch/x86/platform/pvh/{enlighten.c,head.S}. (Just because there are no
> .c or .S files in arch/x86).
Right.
> Maybe Xen ought to be moved under
> arch/x86/platform too.
And hyperv and kvm, too?
No, I think arch/x86/xen/ is fine.
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists