linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] xhci: Add Intel extended cap / otg phy mux handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180301072343.GB5335@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 09:23:43 +0200
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] xhci: Add Intel extended cap / otg phy mux
 handling

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 28-02-18 16:15, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> > > index 96099a245c69..5917e3095e2a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> > > @@ -1825,6 +1825,7 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
> > >   /* Reserved. It was XHCI_U2_DISABLE_WAKE */
> > >   #define XHCI_ASMEDIA_MODIFY_FLOWCONTROL	(1 << 28)
> > >   #define XHCI_HW_LPM_DISABLE	(1 << 29)
> > > +#define XHCI_INTEL_USB_ROLE_SW	(1 << 30)
> > 
> > Did you rebased these on tope of the latest usb-next?
> 
> No I did not expect that to be necessary, but I see now that it is.
> I've just done a rebase locally, any other remarks before I send
> out a v6?

Nothing from me.


Thanks,

-- 
heikki