[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180301150420.19a14fd3@mschwideX1>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 15:04:20 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] s390: Use _refcount for pgtables
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 15:53:10 +0300
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 02:31:54PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > s390 borrows the storage used for _mapcount in struct page in order to
> > account whether the bottom or top half is being used for 2kB page
> > tables. I want to use that for something else, so use the top byte of
> > _refcount instead of the bottom byte of _mapcount. _refcount may
> > temporarily be incremented by other CPUs that see a stale pointer to
> > this page in the page cache, but each CPU can only increment it by one,
> > and there are no systems with 2^24 CPUs today, so they will not change
> > the upper byte of _refcount. We do have to be a little careful not to
> > lose any of their writes (as they will subsequently decrement the
> > counter).
>
> Hm. I'm more worried about false-negative put_page_testzero().
> Are you sure it won't lead to leaks. I cannot say from the code changes.
>
> And for page-table pages should have planty space in other fields.
> IIRC page->mapping is unused there.
2^^24 put_page_testzero calls for page table pages? I don't think so.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists