[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87woyw8pxe.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:55:57 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] powerpc: Remove warning on array size when empty
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org> writes:
> When neither CONFIG_ALTIVEC, nor CONFIG_VSX or CONFIG_PPC64 is defined, the
> array feature_properties is defined as an empty array, which in turn
> triggers the following warning (treated as error on W=1):
>
> CC arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.o
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c: In function ‘check_cpu_feature_properties’:
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c:298:16: error: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Werror=type-limits]
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_properties); ++i, ++fp) {
> ^
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Ugh, that's annoying.
This seems to work?
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
index 4dffef947b8a..5215119e249c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -291,11 +291,11 @@ static inline void identical_pvr_fixup(unsigned long node)
static void __init check_cpu_feature_properties(unsigned long node)
{
- unsigned long i;
struct feature_property *fp = feature_properties;
const __be32 *prop;
+ int i;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_properties); ++i, ++fp) {
+ for (i = 0; i < (int)ARRAY_SIZE(feature_properties); ++i, ++fp) {
prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, fp->name, NULL);
if (prop && be32_to_cpup(prop) >= fp->min_value) {
cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= fp->cpu_feature;
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists