lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180301161042.GA14799@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 09:10:42 -0700
From:   Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>, axboe@...com,
        sagi@...mberg.me, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] nvme-pci: assign separate irq vectors for adminq and
 ioq0

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 11:03:30PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> If all CPUs for the 1st IRQ vector of admin queue are offline, then I
> guess NVMe can't work any more.

Yikes, with respect to admin commands, it appears you're right if your
system allows offlining CPU0.

> So looks it is a good idea to make admin queue's IRQ vector assigned as
> non-managed IRQs.

It'd still be considered managed even if it's a 'pre_vector', though
it would get the default mask with all possible CPUs.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ