[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180301162130.GB15087@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 17:21:30 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Quytelda Kahja <quytelda@...alin.org>
Cc: christian.gromm@...rochip.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Michael.Fabry@...rochip.com, chris@...ineersdelight.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] staging: most: Replace calls to BUG_ON() with
WARN_ONCE() and return.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:58:33PM -0800, Quytelda Kahja wrote:
> Replace calls to BUG_ON() used to check for NULL pointers with WARN_ONCE()
> followed by a return.
Are you sure this will work?
>
> Signed-off-by: Quytelda Kahja <quytelda@...alin.org>
> ---
> drivers/staging/most/core.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/core.c b/drivers/staging/most/core.c
> index 18157dd80324..3f65390a6e17 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/most/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/most/core.c
> @@ -916,7 +916,11 @@ static void arm_mbo(struct mbo *mbo)
> unsigned long flags;
> struct most_channel *c;
>
> - BUG_ON((!mbo) || (!mbo->context));
> + if (WARN_ONCE(!mbo || !mbo->context,
> + "Bad mbo or missing channel reference.\n")) {
> + return;
How is the code supposed to recover from this major problem?
> + }
> +
> c = mbo->context;
>
> if (c->is_poisoned) {
> @@ -1001,7 +1005,7 @@ static int arm_mbo_chain(struct most_channel *c, int dir,
> void most_submit_mbo(struct mbo *mbo)
> {
> if (WARN_ONCE(!mbo || !mbo->context,
> - "bad mbo or missing channel reference\n"))
> + "Bad mbo or missing channel reference.\n"))
You did something different here that you did not describe in your
changelog :(
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists