[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bbe9bf3-24c1-acd9-200d-513520d34558@lechnology.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:44:29 -0600
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/42] clk: davinci: New driver for davinci PSC clocks
On 03/01/2018 02:36 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2018-02-28 22:40 GMT+01:00 David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>:
>> On 02/28/2018 06:38 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I think I found the reason for the strange crashes we were
>>> experiencing (emac core->name being NULL) thanks to Sekhar who pointed
>>> me in the right direction.
>>>
>>> The mdio driver fails to probe with v7 due to the supplied clock rate
>>> being wrong. Before failing we register the emac clock with
>>> pm_clk_add_clk(). When clock_ops puts the clock, it decreases the
>>> reference count of the clock, but we never actually increased it in
>>> the first place in the line above. The core clock code then destroys
>>> the associated clk_core structure. When the next user comes around (in
>>> our case the clk debug functions) the system crashes.
>>>
>>> I believe there to be two issues: one is with v7 - we need to increase
>>> the clock reference count in davinci_psc_genpd_attach_dev().
>>>
>>> Second is the error path in the clock framework - we should remove the
>>> destroyed clk_core from the debug list, which is not being done now.
>>>
>>> Why we even need to track the refcount of clk_core is a mistery for me
>>> though. Stephen, Mike?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bartosz Golaszewski
>>
>>
>> Great find. I figured it had to be something like this, but I wasn't
>> able to reproduce the problem yet.
>>
>> I suppose it is time to spin up a v8 with some fixes.
>
> I still don't know why the mdio clock rate is much lower than in
> mainline though. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Bart
>
Now that you have fixed the crash, can you answer the questions I have
asked earlier?
> Can you post the output of this command so that I can see how your
clocks are setup:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary
> Using your workaround, can you run:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary
If you see:
1e27000.clock-controller: emac off-0
then genpd is not working like it is supposed to. You should see something
like this for device that are working:
1e27000.clock-controller: uart2 on
/devices/platform/soc@...0000/1d0d000.serial active
Powered by blists - more mailing lists