lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180301164630.GB23321@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 17:46:30 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/45] arm Spectre fix backport review for LTS 4.9

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:53:37PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Resent without non-upstream patches.
> 
> This backport patchset fixed the spectre issue, it's original branch:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=kpti
> A few dependency or fixingpatches are also picked up, if they are necessary
>  and no functional changes.
> 
> No bug found from kernelci.org and lkft testing. It also could be gotten from:
> 
> git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-stable.git v4.9-spectre-upstream-only

Also, how did you test, what platforms did you test, and did you test
that this actually did fix the spectre issue on your platforms?  If so,
what test did you use?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ