[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3527faf1-3f3a-88d0-caa8-d94d75437d73@deltatee.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:16:24 -0700
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] IB/core: Add optional PCI P2P flag to
rdma_rw_ctx_[init|destroy]()
Hey Sagi,
Thanks for the review!
On 01/03/18 03:32 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> int rdma_rw_ctx_init(struct rdma_rw_ctx *ctx, struct ib_qp *qp, u8
>> port_num,
>> struct scatterlist *sg, u32 sg_cnt, u32 sg_offset,
>> - u64 remote_addr, u32 rkey, enum dma_data_direction dir)
>> + u64 remote_addr, u32 rkey, enum dma_data_direction dir,
>> + unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> struct ib_device *dev = qp->pd->device;
>> int ret;
>> - ret = ib_dma_map_sg(dev, sg, sg_cnt, dir);
>> + if (flags & RDMA_RW_CTX_FLAG_PCI_P2PDMA)
>> + ret = pci_p2pdma_map_sg(dev->dma_device, sg, sg_cnt, dir);
>> + else
>> + ret = ib_dma_map_sg(dev, sg, sg_cnt, dir);
>> +
>
> Why not use is_pci_p2pdma_page(sg) instead of a flag? It would be so
> much cleaner...
Yes, that sounds like a good idea. We can make that change for v3.
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists