linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/115] 4.14.24-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180302185244.GA16331@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 19:52:44 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/115] 4.14.24-stable review

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 11:48:49PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 2 March 2018 at 14:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.24 release.
> > There are 115 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Mar  4 08:44:32 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.24-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
> 
> NOTE:
> dragonboard-410c and qemu-system-x86_64 are added to testing device pool.
> ignore boot failures 3 on dragonboard-410c are due to local LAVA setup.
> 
> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> kernel: 4.14.24-rc1
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.14.y
> git commit: 0ae11358b0bdffc782ee655fd103b95cbcafb899
> git describe: v4.14.23-116-g0ae11358b0bd
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.14-oe/build/v4.14.23-116-g0ae11358b0bd
> 
> 
> No regressions (compared to build v4.14.23)

Great, thanks for testing these three and letting me know.

greg k-h