[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180302150621.069d1443@vmware.local.home>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:06:21 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] trace: Eliminate
cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor of cond_resched()
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:48:58 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> So how about I rename cond_resched_rcu_qs() to cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(),
> which at least gives a hint as to where it needs to be used?
>
> Would that work for you?
Yes, definitely!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists