[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F7179402-E931-45DB-903E-5D92608A464E@raithlin.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 20:51:42 +0000
From: "Stephen Bates" <sbates@...thlin.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] nvmet: Optionally use PCI P2P memory
> http://nvmexpress.org/wp-content/uploads/NVM-Express-1.3-Ratified-TPs.zip
@Keith - my apologies.
@Christoph - thanks for the link
So my understanding of when the technical content surrounding new NVMe Technical Proposals (TPs) was wrong. I though the TP content could only be discussed once disclosed in the public standard. I have now learnt that once the TPs are ratified they are publically available!
However, as Logan pointed out, PMRs are not relevant to this series so let's defer discussion on how to support them to a later date!
Stephen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists