[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1110bcae-f4c5-68ff-77df-28934a21dd86@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:25:35 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/free_pcppages_bulk: do not hold lock when
picking pages to free
On 03/02/2018 01:23 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On my Sandybridge desktop, with will-it-scale/page_fault1/single process
>> run to emulate uniprocessor system, the score is(average of 3 runs):
>>
>> base(patch 1/3): 649710
>> this patch: 653554 +0.6%
> Does that mean we got faster or slower?
Faster. The unit of measurement here is iterations through a loop.
More iterations are better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists