[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gKyvkHY_qQTYvd8wrLpaXXciJyWZY+9T7Q_Eg-Zuxpgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 14:21:40 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>,
Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Gerd Rausch <gerd.rausch@...cle.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] vfio, dax: prevent long term filesystem-dax pins
and other fixes
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> I really don't like these IS_DEVDAX and IS_FSDAX flags. We should
> stop pretending DAX is a global per-inode choice and get rid of these
> magic flags entirely. So please convert the instances inside the
> various file systems to checking the file system mount options instead.
>
> For the core ones we'll need to differentiate:
>
> - the checks in generic_file_read_iter and __generic_file_write_iter
> seem to not be needed anymore at all since we stopped abusing the
> direct I/O code for DAX, so they should probably be removed.
> - io_is_direct is a weird check and should probably just go away,
> as there is not point in always setting IOCB_DIRECT for DAX I/O
> - fadvise should either become a file op, or a flag on the inode that
> fadvice is supported instead of the nasty noop_backing_dev_info or
> DAX check.
> - Ditto for madvise
> - vma_is_dax should probably be replaced with a VMA flag.
> - thp_get_unmapped_area I don't really understand why we have a dax
> check there.
> - dax_mapping will be much harder to sort out.
>
> But all these DAX flags certainly look like a major hodge podge to me.
They are indeed a hodge-podge. The problem is that the current
IS_DAX() is broken. So I'd like to propose fixing IS_DAX() with
IS_FSDAX() + IS_DEVDAX() for 4.16-rc4 and queue up these wider reworks
you propose for the next merge window.
Acceptable?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists