linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: syncronous events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180302153849.d9d7b9a873755c6f5e883d0d@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:38:49 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, crml <criu@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: syncronous events

On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:19:49 +0200 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> These patches add ability to generate userfaultfd events so that their
> processing will be synchronized with the non-cooperative thread that caused
> the event.
> 
> In the non-cooperative case userfaultfd resumes execution of the thread
> that caused an event when the notification is read() by the uffd monitor.
> In some cases, like, for example, madvise(MADV_REMOVE), it might be
> desirable to keep the thread that caused the event suspended until the
> uffd monitor had the event handled to avoid races between the thread that
> caused the and userfaultfd ioctls.
> 
> Theses patches extend the userfaultfd API with an implementation of
> UFFD_EVENT_REMOVE_SYNC that allows to keep the thread that triggered
> UFFD_EVENT_REMOVE until the uffd monitor would not wake it explicitly.

"might be desirable" is a bit weak.  It might not be desirable, too ;)

_Is_ it desirable?  What are the use-cases and what is the end-user
benefit?