[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYtTLV1R+LpPp8J8uGX9f7sFXOkPuH8du0zz_v=FZHMBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 09:51:56 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Initial Allwinner H6 support
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io> wrote:
> This patchset adds initial support for the Allwinner H6 SoC.
>
> It's quite different from earlier Allwinner SoCs. For example, the
> memory map is refactored, and the CCU is rearranged. It's also the first
> Allwinner SoC with PCI Express interface, and the second one with USB
> 3.0 (the first one is A80).
>
> This patchset adds the most basical support for it, including the main pin
> controller, the main CCU and the basical device tree.
It seems the pin control part is more or less finished, I will
apply it after v4 if Maxime provides ACKs for it.
Is it fine to merge the pinctrl drivers/* portions in isolation from the
rest?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists