[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180302084450.450063663@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 09:51:02 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@...rochip.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 16/56] spi: atmel: fixed spin_lock usage inside atmel_spi_remove
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@...rochip.com>
[ Upstream commit 66e900a3d225575c8b48b59ae1fe74bb6e5a65cc ]
The only part of atmel_spi_remove which needs to be atomic is hardware
reset.
atmel_spi_stop_dma calls dma_terminate_all and this needs interrupts
enabled.
atmel_spi_release_dma calls dma_release_channel and dma_release_channel
locks a mutex inside of spin_lock.
So the call of these functions can't be inside a spin_lock.
Reported-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@...rochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
@@ -1669,12 +1669,12 @@ static int atmel_spi_remove(struct platf
pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
/* reset the hardware and block queue progress */
- spin_lock_irq(&as->lock);
if (as->use_dma) {
atmel_spi_stop_dma(as);
atmel_spi_release_dma(as);
}
+ spin_lock_irq(&as->lock);
spi_writel(as, CR, SPI_BIT(SWRST));
spi_writel(as, CR, SPI_BIT(SWRST)); /* AT91SAM9263 Rev B workaround */
spi_readl(as, SR);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists