[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180302090453.ial6getrlauragft@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:04:54 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] lock_parent() breakage when used from shrink_dentry_list()
(was Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] fs/dcache: Avoid remaining try_lock loop in
shrink_dentry_list())
On 2018-02-25 07:40:05 [+0000], Al Viro wrote:
> FWIW, a variant of that series is in #work.dcache; it's
> almost certainly not the final (I want to clean the things up
> and probably reorder them as well) and it needs one hell of
> profiling and review. It seems to work, and I don't see any
> obvious performance regressions (everything seems to be within
> normal noise), but I'd like it beaten up a lot more.
If you have something in mind, I could fire up something.
> I'll play with cleaning up and reordering tomorrow after I get
> some sleep. In the meanwhile, the current state of that set is at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git #work.dcache
I've put it in -RT, let it do some upgrades and other things and nothing
bad happened so far.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists