lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9de7d9d1-3469-c315-ce47-0faa67a4e4c4@deltatee.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 17:03:09 -0700
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] nvmet: Optionally use PCI P2P memory



On 01/03/18 04:57 PM, Stephen  Bates wrote:
>> We don't want to lump these all together without knowing which region you're allocating from, right?
> 
> In all seriousness I do agree with you on these Keith in the long term. We would consider adding property flags for the memory as it is added to the p2p core and then the allocator could evolve to intelligently dish it out. Attributes like endurance, latency and special write commit requirements could all become attributes in time. Perhaps one more reason for a central entity for p2p memory allocation so this code does not end up having to go into many different drivers?

Ugh, I don't know... An allocator for PMR is going to be quite a 
different animal. It would probably need to look more like a filesystem 
given you'd need to access the same regions across reboots. I don't 
think it fits the p2pmem paradigm at all. I think it's something 
entirely new all together and who knows exactly what it will look like.

Logan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ