[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda=deFSmk2iyrtde3Z-aj6rW9_jNfE3Ep4X=ejprGxRUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:33:24 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Ivajlo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
ext Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Martijn Braam <martijn@...xit.nl>,
Filip Matijević <filip.matijevic.pz@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mickuláš Qwertz <abcloriens@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
clayton@...ftyguy.net, Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andrew F . Davis" <afd@...com>,
Patrik Bachan <patrikbachan@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
serge@...lyn.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] regression v4.16 on Nokia N900: sound does not work
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> Linux-Regression-ID: lr#4b650f
>
> On Tue 2018-02-27 09:43:32, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>>
>> > I did git bisect, and the winner seems to be:
>> >
>> > pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-n900$ git bisect bad
>> > c85823390215e52d68d3826df92a447ed31e5c80 is the first bad commit
>> > commit c85823390215e52d68d3826df92a447ed31e5c80
>> > Author: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> > Date: Wed Dec 27 16:37:44 2017 +0100
>> >
>> > gpio: of: Support SPI nonstandard GPIO properties
>>
>> I have fixes queued for this, tried to send a pull request yesterday
>> but it turns out the fixes need fixing... OK I'm onto it anyways.
>
> Do you have any updates? Is there way to fix dts so that this does not
> trigger on N900?
>
> If this is taking longer to fix, should c85823390215 be reverted in
> the meantime? It does not seem particulary important/urgent...
No patience between the v4.16 release candidates eh ;)
commit 6662ae6af82df10259a70c7569b4c12ea7f3ba93
("gpiolib: Keep returning EPROBE_DEFER when we should")
and
commit ce27fb2c56db6ccfe8099343bb4afdab15e77e7b
("gpio: Handle deferred probing in of_find_gpio() properly")
that are both in Torvalds' tree since yesterday should be fixing
this, I think? Did you try just using the upstream HEAD?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists