[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180302094140.ncypewkdg6g6rs2g@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 17:41:40 +0800
From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/power: Polish the tracepoints cpu_idle and
cpu_frequency
> >> That rather isn't the case if negative values are ever passed to the
> >> tracepoint, right?
> >>
> > yes.
> >> Which seems to be the reason why you want to make this change, isn't it?
> >>
> > yes, to improve readability.
> >
> >> So maybe fix the code using the tracepoint(s) to avoid passing
> >> negative values to it(them)?
> > For cpu_idle event, [0, CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX) are used to index the idle state arrary,
> > so I think a appropriate value for PWR_EVENT_EXIT is -1 (defined in include/trace/events/power.h).
> > Or do you have a better idea? Thanks!
>
> Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> I'm saying that the code using the CPU PM tracepoints is not expected
> to pass -1 as the CPU number to them. IOW, neither -1 nor its UL
> representation should ever appear in the output of these tracepoints.
> If that happens, it is a problem with the code using the tracepoints
> which needs to be fixed. Users should not see any of these values.
This patch only changed 'state' field but cpuid. For cpu_idle event, 'state' is
singned value, but for cpu_frequency it is unsinged.
The cpuid is always unsinged value. So no one passes -1 as CPU number.
--
Thanks,
Changbin Du
Powered by blists - more mailing lists