| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZc0ataQGWQ-81v1+_wCRpv=VVk195rafJcEQUFM5xfOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 11:14:05 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Matheus Castello <matheus@...tello.eng.br>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: bc2835: Add brcm,level property
Hi Matheus,
sorry for top-posting, but new DT properties have to be ACKed
by the device tree maintainers, so quoting it all.
I understand why you use the legacy bcm-specific bindings for this,
but in theory nothing really stops you from just using
"output-high" and "output-low" from the generic properties,
even if you are not using the generic code to handle them but
instead parse them just like in this driver.
The only reason I could think of not to use them would be consistency,
like it would look not so elegant.
But if we look at the pin control bindings from a birds eye view
the big problem with consistency is the proliferation of custom
vendor bindings like this.
So there is a bit of conflict of interest here.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Matheus Castello
<matheus@...tello.eng.br> wrote:
> Property to set initial value of pin output buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Castello <matheus@...tello.eng.br>
> ---
> .../bindings/pinctrl/brcm,bcm2835-gpio.txt | 5 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,bcm2835-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,bcm2835-gpio.txt
> index 2569866..6834f1d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,bcm2835-gpio.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,bcm2835-gpio.txt
> @@ -54,8 +54,11 @@ Optional subnode-properties:
> 0: none
> 1: down
> 2: up
> +- brcm,level: Integer, representing the value of output buffer to apply to the pin(s):
> + 0: low
> + 1: high
>
> -Each of brcm,function and brcm,pull may contain either a single value which
> +Each of brcm,function, brcm,pull and brcm,level may contain either a single value which
> will be applied to all pins in brcm,pins, or 1 value for each entry in
> brcm,pins.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
> index 785c366..0ace548 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@
> enum bcm2835_pinconf_param {
> /* argument: bcm2835_pinconf_pull */
> BCM2835_PINCONF_PARAM_PULL,
> + /* argument: bcm2835_pinconf_level */
> + BCM2835_PINCONF_PARAM_LEVEL,
> };
>
> #define BCM2835_PINCONF_PACK(_param_, _arg_) ((_param_) << 16 | (_arg_))
> @@ -725,16 +727,42 @@ static int bcm2835_pctl_dt_node_to_map_pull(struct bcm2835_pinctrl *pc,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int bcm2835_pctl_dt_node_to_map_level(struct bcm2835_pinctrl *pc,
> + struct device_node *np, u32 pin, u32 level,
> + struct pinctrl_map **maps)
> +{
> + struct pinctrl_map *map = *maps;
> + unsigned long *configs;
> +
> + if (level > 2) {
> + dev_err(pc->dev, "%pOF: invalid brcm,level %d\n", np, level);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + configs = kzalloc(sizeof(*configs), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!configs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + configs[0] = BCM2835_PINCONF_PACK(BCM2835_PINCONF_PARAM_LEVEL, level);
> +
> + map->type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN;
> + map->data.configs.group_or_pin = bcm2835_gpio_pins[pin].name;
> + map->data.configs.configs = configs;
> + map->data.configs.num_configs = 1;
> + (*maps)++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int bcm2835_pctl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> struct device_node *np,
> struct pinctrl_map **map, unsigned *num_maps)
> {
> struct bcm2835_pinctrl *pc = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> - struct property *pins, *funcs, *pulls;
> - int num_pins, num_funcs, num_pulls, maps_per_pin;
> + struct property *pins, *funcs, *pulls, *levels;
> + int num_pins, num_funcs, num_pulls, num_levels, maps_per_pin;
> struct pinctrl_map *maps, *cur_map;
> int i, err;
> - u32 pin, func, pull;
> + u32 pin, func, pull, level;
>
> pins = of_find_property(np, "brcm,pins", NULL);
> if (!pins) {
> @@ -744,6 +772,7 @@ static int bcm2835_pctl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>
> funcs = of_find_property(np, "brcm,function", NULL);
> pulls = of_find_property(np, "brcm,pull", NULL);
> + levels = of_find_property(np, "brcm,level", NULL);
>
> if (!funcs && !pulls) {
> dev_err(pc->dev,
> @@ -755,6 +784,7 @@ static int bcm2835_pctl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> num_pins = pins->length / 4;
> num_funcs = funcs ? (funcs->length / 4) : 0;
> num_pulls = pulls ? (pulls->length / 4) : 0;
> + num_levels = levels ? (levels->length / 4) : 0;
>
> if (num_funcs > 1 && num_funcs != num_pins) {
> dev_err(pc->dev,
> @@ -770,11 +800,20 @@ static int bcm2835_pctl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (num_levels > 1 && num_levels != num_pins) {
> + dev_err(pc->dev,
> + "%pOF: brcm,level must have 1 or %d entries\n",
> + np, num_pins);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> maps_per_pin = 0;
> if (num_funcs)
> maps_per_pin++;
> if (num_pulls)
> maps_per_pin++;
> + if (num_levels)
> + maps_per_pin++;
> cur_map = maps = kzalloc(num_pins * maps_per_pin * sizeof(*maps),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!maps)
> @@ -811,6 +850,17 @@ static int bcm2835_pctl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> if (err)
> goto out;
> }
> + if (num_levels) {
> + err = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "brcm,level",
> + (num_levels > 1) ? i : 0, &level);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = bcm2835_pctl_dt_node_to_map_level(pc, np, pin,
> + level, &cur_map);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> *map = maps;
> @@ -931,23 +981,25 @@ static int bcm2835_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> param = BCM2835_PINCONF_UNPACK_PARAM(configs[i]);
> arg = BCM2835_PINCONF_UNPACK_ARG(configs[i]);
>
> - if (param != BCM2835_PINCONF_PARAM_PULL)
> + if (param == BCM2835_PINCONF_PARAM_PULL) {
> + off = GPIO_REG_OFFSET(pin);
> + bit = GPIO_REG_SHIFT(pin);
> +
> + bcm2835_gpio_wr(pc, GPPUD, arg & 3);
> + /*
> + * Docs say to wait 150 cycles, but not of what. We assume a
> + * 1 MHz clock here, which is pretty slow...
> + */
> + udelay(150);
> + bcm2835_gpio_wr(pc, GPPUDCLK0 + (off * 4), BIT(bit));
> + udelay(150);
> + bcm2835_gpio_wr(pc, GPPUDCLK0 + (off * 4), 0);
> + } else if (param == BCM2835_PINCONF_PARAM_LEVEL) {
> + /* write in register */
> + bcm2835_gpio_set_bit(pc, arg ? GPSET0 : GPCLR0, pin);
> + } else {
> return -EINVAL;
> -
> - off = GPIO_REG_OFFSET(pin);
> - bit = GPIO_REG_SHIFT(pin);
> -
> - bcm2835_gpio_wr(pc, GPPUD, arg & 3);
> - /*
> - * BCM2835 datasheet say to wait 150 cycles, but not of what.
> - * But the VideoCore firmware delay for this operation
> - * based nearly on the same amount of VPU cycles and this clock
> - * runs at 250 MHz.
> - */
> - udelay(1);
> - bcm2835_gpio_wr(pc, GPPUDCLK0 + (off * 4), BIT(bit));
> - udelay(1);
> - bcm2835_gpio_wr(pc, GPPUDCLK0 + (off * 4), 0);
> + }
> } /* for each config */
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists