[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <290c749a-70bf-2b74-1fb9-2de26708d001@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 11:21:23 +0100
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
To: Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stubner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Vincent ABRIOU <vincent.abriou@...com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/synopsys: dsi: readl_poll_timeout return
value clean up
On 01.03.2018 10:00, Philippe CORNU wrote:
> Hi Archit, Andrzej & Laurent,
>
> May I ask you please your feedback on this small patch?
> Many thanks,
>
> Philippe :-)
>
> On 02/04/2018 10:36 PM, Philippe Cornu wrote:
>> The readl_poll_timeout() return value is 0 in case of success
>> so it is better to detect errors without taking care of the
>> return value sign.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...com>
The patch is of course correct. However I am not sure if necessary. For
sure functionally it does not change anything.
AFAIK kernel CodingStyle says nothing about it, so I suppose it is
matter of personal taste.
Anyway I can give it:
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
--
Regards
Andrzej
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>> index 65aeb3f78b48..4d0e8471a15c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 hdr_val)
>> ret = qq(dsi->base + DSI_CMD_PKT_STATUS,
>> val, !(val & GEN_CMD_FULL), 1000,
>> CMD_PKT_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to get available command FIFO\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 hdr_val)
>> ret = readl_poll_timeout(dsi->base + DSI_CMD_PKT_STATUS,
>> val, (val & mask) == mask,
>> 1000, CMD_PKT_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to write command FIFO\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
>> ret = readl_poll_timeout(dsi->base + DSI_CMD_PKT_STATUS,
>> val, !(val & GEN_PLD_W_FULL), 1000,
>> CMD_PKT_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dsi->dev,
>> "failed to get available write payload FIFO\n");
>> return ret;
>> @@ -716,13 +716,13 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_enable(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
>>
>> ret = readl_poll_timeout(dsi->base + DSI_PHY_STATUS, val,
>> val & PHY_LOCK, 1000, PHY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> + if (ret)
>> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to wait phy lock state\n");
>>
>> ret = readl_poll_timeout(dsi->base + DSI_PHY_STATUS,
>> val, val & PHY_STOP_STATE_CLK_LANE, 1000,
>> PHY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> + if (ret)
>> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to wait phy clk lane stop state\n");
>> }
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists