lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180302111931.GX9418@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 11:19:31 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: s3c2410: Properly handle interrupts of number 0

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:34:44PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Interrupt number 0 (returned by platform_get_irq()) might be a valid IRQ
> so do not treat it as an error.  If interrupt 0 was configured, the driver
> would exit the probe early, before finishing initialization, but with
> 0-exit status.

The official position (as stated by Linus) is that interrupt zero is
not a valid interrupt for peripheral drivers (it may be valid within
architecture code for things like the x86 PIT, but nothing else.)

You need to number your platform interrupts from one rather than zero.

Note that there have been patches proposed to make platform_get_irq()
return an error rather than returning a value of zero, so changing
the driver in this way is not a good idea.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ