lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 07:34:01 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/free_pcppages_bulk: do not hold lock when
 picking pages to free

On 03/01/2018 11:15 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> 
>> I am still quite surprised that this would have such a large impact.
> Most likely due to the cachelines for these page structures are warmed
> up outside of zone->lock.

The workload here is a pretty tight microbenchmark and single biggest
bottleneck is cache misses on 'struct page'.  It's not memory bandwidth
bound.  So, anything you can give the CPU keep it fed and not waiting on
cache misses will be a win.

There's never going to be a real-world workload that sees this kind of
increase, but the change in the micro isn't super-surprising because it
so directly targets the bottleneck.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ