[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180302163900.ldnkhgsvqxlki4ju@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 17:39:01 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Haris Okanovic <haris.okanovic@...com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, julia.cartwright@...com, gratian.crisan@...com,
anna-maria@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] timers: Don't search for expired timers while
TIMER_SOFTIRQ is scheduled
On 2018-03-02 10:29:56 [-0600], Haris Okanovic wrote:
> > Could please point me to the code/patches or something?
>
> I rebase onto v4.14.20-rt17, running some sanity test before reposting to ml
> (cyclictest & Anna's timertest). Will post V4 sometime today (US Central
> Time) if everything goes well.
>
> Are you also asking for a 4.9 version? I'm fine leaving it out of 4.9.
Hmmm. Maybe this is a form of miscommunication here :)
So my understanding is that you complain/ask why there is an older
version of the patch still in v4.9-RT:
|It was added back into 4.9 at some point after v4.9.30-rt20. I see an older
|version in v4.9.68-rt60, for example, hence my original email. It was dropped
|sometime thereafter, presumably because it no longer cleanly applies. I don't
|see it in v4.14.20-rt17, for example.
So I ask where you see the old version of your patch in v4.9-RT. Yes it
was added, then removed and it never appeared back in. However, I don't
see anymore in v4.9.68-rt60.
> -- Haris
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists