[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB3342BDF9D4E389B4E296A53298C50@VI1PR0402MB3342.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 17:27:41 +0000
From: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] crypto: talitos - chain in buffered data for ahash
on SEC1
On 10/6/2017 4:05 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
[...]
> @@ -1778,6 +1814,36 @@ static int common_nonsnoop_hash(struct talitos_edesc *edesc,
> if (is_sec1 && from_talitos_ptr_len(&desc->ptr[3], true) == 0)
> talitos_handle_buggy_hash(ctx, edesc, &desc->ptr[3]);
>
> + if (is_sec1 && req_ctx->nbuf && length) {
> + struct talitos_desc *desc2 = desc + 1;
> + dma_addr_t next_desc;
[...]
> + next_desc = dma_map_single(dev, &desc2->hdr1, TALITOS_DESC_SIZE,
> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> + desc->next_desc = cpu_to_be32(next_desc);
Where is desc->next_desc initialized for the !is_sec1 case?
Memory allocation is done using kmalloc(), and since desc->next_desc is checked
in some cases also for SEC 2.x+, it should be initialized to 0.
Thanks,
Horia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists