[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 18:25:17 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: s3c2410: Properly handle interrupts of number 0
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:32:22PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> How do we break this status quo and finally solve the IRQ 0 and
>> NO_IRQ issue?
Guys, the question: Wouldn't be request_irq() failed when it gets a
wrong number on input?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists