linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V1 01/12] audit: add container id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Mar 2018 10:01:43 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:     mszeredi@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, simo@...hat.com,
        jlayton@...hat.com, carlos@...hat.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, dhowells@...hat.com,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, luto@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        trondmy@...marydata.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V1 01/12] audit: add container id

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:19 AM, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:41:04PM -0500, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> ...
>> +static inline bool audit_containerid_set(struct task_struct *tsk)
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> the calls to audit_containerid_set() confused me.  Could you make it
> is_audit_containerid_set() or audit_containerid_isset()?

I haven't gone through the entire patchset yet, but I wanted to
quickly comment on this ... I really dislike the
function-names-as-sentences approach and would would greatly prefer
audit_containerid_isset().

>> +{
>> +     return audit_get_containerid(tsk) != INVALID_CID;
>> +}

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com