[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180304181010.GA7030@krava>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 19:10:10 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, timur@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 1/3] perf, tools: Support wildcards on pmu name in
dynamic pmu events
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 09:12:45AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > +#include <fnmatch.h>
> > > #include <linux/compiler.h>
> > > #include <linux/list.h>
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > @@ -241,7 +242,7 @@ PE_NAME opt_event_config
> > > if (!strncmp(name, "uncore_", 7) &&
> > > strncmp($1, "uncore_", 7))
> > > name += 7;
> > > - if (!strncmp($1, name, strlen($1))) {
> > > + if (!strncmp($1, name, strlen($1)) || !fnmatch($1, name, 0)) {
> >
> > could we now get rid of the strncmp in here and keep the
> > glob matching only?
>
> That would break existing command lines. Not a good idea.
I hoped that only you guys are using this and would rewrite your scripts ;-)
I had no idea there's fnmatch func before.. too bad, ok
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists