linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] mmc: tmio: remove useless TMIO_MASK_CMD handling in tmio_mmc_host

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180304223957.3f3s3lbrerenyula@ninjato>
Date:   Sun, 4 Mar 2018 23:39:57 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] mmc: tmio: remove useless TMIO_MASK_CMD
 handling in tmio_mmc_host_probe()

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:28:16AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> TMIO_MASK_CMD is properly enabled in tmio_mmc_start_command().
> 
> We have no reason to set it up in tmio_mmc_host_probe().  (If we
> really wanted to set it in the probe, we would have to do likewise
> when resuming.)
> 
> Even worse, the following code is extremely confusing:
> 
>   _host->sdcard_irq_mask &= ~irq_mask;
> 
> The logic is opposite between "->sdcard_irq_mask" and "irq_mask".
> The intention is not clear at a glance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>

Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)