[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1520236170-14668-9-git-send-email-himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:19:27 +0530
From: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
To: jic23@...nel.org
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, knaack.h@....de,
pmeerw@...erw.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daniel.baluta@...il.com,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] Staging: iio: accel: Use switch statement than if-else
Use switch statement instead of if-else pair to explicitly match
the only two channels present.
Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16201.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16201.c b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16201.c
index 1737708..307d4ab 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16201.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16201.c
@@ -114,12 +114,15 @@ static int adis16201_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
switch (chan->type) {
case IIO_VOLTAGE:
- if (chan->channel == 0) {
+ switch (chan->channel) {
+ case 0:
*val = 1;
*val2 = 220000;
- } else {
+ break;
+ case 1:
*val = 0;
*val2 = 610000;
+ break;
}
return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
case IIO_TEMP:
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists