[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180305081906.t33mocscprsrlvzp@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:19:06 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dexuan-Linux Cui <dexuan.linux@...il.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: "x86/boot/compressed/64: Prepare trampoline memory" breaks boot
on Zotac CI-321
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 12:46:28PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 03.03.2018 um 11:02 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> >
> > * Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 03.03.2018 um 00:50 schrieb Dexuan-Linux Cui:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com <mailto:hkallweit1@...il.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Recently my Mini PC Zotac CI-321 started to reboot immediately before
> >>> anything was written to the console.
> >>>
> >>> Bisecting lead to b91993a87aff "x86/boot/compressed/64: Prepare
> >>> trampoline memory" being the change breaking boot.
> >>>
> >>> If you need any more information, please let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Rgds, Heiner
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This may fix the issue: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/13/668
> >>>
> >>> Kirill posted a v2 patchset 3 days ago and I suppose the patchset should include the fix.
> >>>
> >> Thanks for the link. I bisected based on the latest next kernel including
> >> v2 of the patchset (IOW - the potential fix is included already).
> >
> > Are you sure? b91993a87aff is the old patch-set - which I just removed from -next
> > and which should thus be gone in the Monday iteration of -next.
> >
> > I have not merged v2 in -tip yet, did it get applied via some other tree?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ingo
> >
> I wanted to apply the fix mentioned in the link but found that the statement was movq already.
> Therefore my (most likely false) understanding that it's v2.
> I'll re-test once v2 is out and let you know.
movq fix is unrelated to the problem.
Please check if current linux-next plus this patchset causes a problem for
you:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180227154217.69347-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists