linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] mmc: tmio: another batch of TMIO MMC fixes and cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFr0=oR2s-SiejG580iy71dUh-K64Ya=trEjZE4zmc5Xfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:06:44 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] mmc: tmio: another batch of TMIO MMC fixes and cleanups

On 5 March 2018 at 10:34, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> Hi Ulf, Wolfram,
>
> 2018-03-05 18:22 GMT+09:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>:
>>
>>> I have added Wolframs tags to the already applied patches and applied
>>> that last two, 15 and 16.
>>
>> Thanks. Please note that patch 14 misses my Rev tag. (I gave it
>> yesterday but the patch was accidently applied before. One round too
>> early, so to say).

Added rev. tag.

>>
>>> They are all present in my next branch. The fix that Wolfram sent on
>>> top, is added immediately after the commit it fixes.
>>
>> Could we also squash it, then?
>>
>
> If Wolfram is fine with squashing,
> that would be cleaner.
>

Done.

> In that case, can you add Tested-by
> to patch 12?

Done.

Kind regards
Uffe