linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 0/5] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180305031357.23950-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon,  5 Mar 2018 11:13:52 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 0/5] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible

Hi,

This patchset tries to spread among online CPUs as far as possible, so
that we can avoid to allocate too less irq vectors with online CPUs
mapped.

For example, in a 8cores system, 4 cpu cores(4~7) are offline/non present,
on a device with 4 queues:

1) before this patchset
	irq 39, cpu list 0-2
	irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6
	irq 41, cpu list 5
	irq 42, cpu list 7

2) after this patchset
	irq 39, cpu list 0,4
	irq 40, cpu list 1,6
	irq 41, cpu list 2,5
	irq 42, cpu list 3,7

Without this patchset, only two vectors(39, 40) can be active, but there
can be 4 active irq vectors after applying this patchset.

One disadvantage is that CPUs from different NUMA node can be mapped to
one same irq vector. Given generally one CPU should be enough to handle
one irq vector, it shouldn't be a big deal. Especailly more vectors have
to be allocated, otherwise performance can be hurt in current
assignment.

V2:
	- address coments from Christoph
	- mark irq_build_affinity_masks as static
	- move constification of get_nodes_in_cpumask's parameter into one
	  prep patch
	- add Reviewed-by tag

Thanks
Ming

Ming Lei (5):
  genirq/affinity: rename *node_to_possible_cpumask as *node_to_cpumask
  genirq/affinity: mark 'node_to_cpumask' as const for
    get_nodes_in_cpumask()
  genirq/affinity: move actual irq vector spread into one helper
  genirq/affinity: support to do irq vectors spread starting from any
    vector
  genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as
    possible

 kernel/irq/affinity.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.5