linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] genalloc: selftest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <488cc366-bd10-425c-ef62-ce8536e3c62a@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:37:10 -0800
From:   J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@...il.com>
To:     Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>, david@...morbit.com,
        willy@...radead.org, keescook@...omium.org, mhocko@...nel.org
Cc:     labbott@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] genalloc: selftest


> +
> +/*
> + * In case of failure of any of these tests, memory corruption is almost
> + * guarranteed; allowing the boot to continue means risking to corrupt
> + * also any filesystem/block device accessed write mode.
> + * Therefore, BUG_ON() is used, when testing.
> + */
> +
> +

I like the explanation; good background info on why something is 
implemented the way it is :-).

Reviewed-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@...il.com>